As
noted by Gumperz (1972, as cited in Wardhaugh, 2002), “communicative competence
describes speakers’ ability to select from the totality of grammatically
correct expressions available to them, forms which appropriately reflect the
social norms governing behavior in specific encounters” (p. 249). In this
sense, it can be concluded that teachers must give consideration to combining
those two different types of communicative activities in the EFL conversation
class. Such an attempt can be realized through the syllables designed to
encourage students to participate both in “planned discourse” (e.g.,
eacher-directed situation drills) and “unplanned discourse” (e.g., free
discussions) throughout the classroom activities. In other words, adopting the
different “teacher roles” from each type of activities (i.e., authentic vs.
non-authentic communicative activities) in classroom will be effective to help
students achieve improved communicative competence in the target language.

In
addition, students are encouraged to strategically use a certain type of expressions
in predictable discourse situations. Providing students with opportunity to
learn the second language norms as well as to negotiate meaning in class will
lead the students to higher levels of L2 proficiency.
No comments:
Post a Comment